Stephen Johnson on "The Intrigue of Complexity "
A quote:
“I would
strongly urge people to see simply, and edit simply.
Your photographs are your asset, much more so than
your Photoshop skills. Those image-editing skills may
well be critical to your craft, but they are
secondary to your photographic vision. “Fix it in
Photoshop” is a prescriptive attitude that often
leads to making images not worth investing time
trying to salvage through image editing.”
Amen to that. I resisted digital photography for
quite along time, only really shooting digital
seriously starting in 2007 with the arrival of my
Leica M8. I stuck with film mostly because the prints
I could get in Black & White were better with the
analog process. I have a darkroom and used it
extensively for years, but the last year has seen it
become a storage room (like many others I suspect)
because the technology (camera ergonomics, printers
and paper) improved. While there was always
manipulations in the darkroom - dodging, burning,
flashing, and cropping, the image generally had to
stand on its own merits in that rectangle on the
easel. Things have certainly changed, and often not
for the better. We all get fascinated with a certain
look, style or feel and sometimes its post-processing
that gives us what we are looking for, but its always
secondary to vision. That frame still has to have it
before a pixel is tweaked. I’m really grateful I
spent years working with film before I went digital
because it taught me to see and to edit. These two
skills mean more than anything else, and they take
years to learn.
As one who works on Lightroom and has contributed to
other Adobe software related to digital photography,
it always strikes me as odd when a great photographer
comments on his “lack of photoshop skill” as if to
appologize for his work when we talk. These are
tools. They help you acheive your vision, but they
are no subsitute for it. A crappy photograph is still
crappy after 10 actions in Photoshop and some layer
magic. I really like Scott’s cajones for publishing
this article - as one could easily point out his
culpability in the “tips and tricks” arms race.
Another quote:
“Solid
image editing is far less about secrets, trickery,
hidden features and shortcuts, than it is about
starting with a strong photograph, knowing your
goals, and methodically working toward them. Craft is
not tricky; it is most often plain hard work and
care.”
To the point, this past week I was in the field with
a friend shooting a story for the National
Geographic. We spent a lot of time focusing on
getting it right - there were long days (and nights)
working with a bag of techniques to make sure that it
was perfect. After a few hours of shooting a
particular object, we decided that something wasn’t
quite right and we’d need do something a bit
different. More shooting and more work lay ahead. Of
course, the knee-jerk was that we could “just fix it
in photoshop” but Alex pointed out that was the easy
way out. His comment (and I’m paraphrasing - I was
holding a big silk scrim in windy conditions) was
fitting:
“This is
the National Geographic - we get it right in camera
because it matters.”
Preach on, brother...




